Clinical publication highlights

Clinical publication highlights

IBA - Clinical publication highlights

On this page, you find a comprehensive summary of the key outcome papers published on proton therapy.

If you would like to receive them regularly via email, please subscribe to our quarterly newsletter. 

We hope you enjoy reading the abstracts, as well as the full text articles. 

Key papers October 2016 - March 2017


Patterns of care in proton therapy for children. Published in the Red Journal, this paper examined patterns of treatments received for pediatric patients with primary CNS malignancies. The authors pointed out that as we continue to demonstrate the potential benefits of PBT in children, efforts are needed to expand the accessibility of PBT for children of all socioeconomic background and regions of the country. (Publication accessible

Lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer. A group of Japanese researchers compared the lifetime attributable risk of secondary cancer (LAR) induced by proton therapy and IMRT in pediatric patients. The paper reported that for categories of brain, head and neck, thoracic, abdominal and whole craniospinal irradiation, the LAR of PBT was significantly lower than IMRT. (Publication accessible )


PRONTOX – a randomized control trial. Although radiochemotherapy with photons is the standard treatment for now for locally advanced NSCLC, but acute radiation-induced toxicity such as esophagitis and pneumonitis can be potentially life-threatening. The Dresden group has commenced this randomized control trial that aims to show a decrease of 39% to 12% of early and intermediate radiation-induced toxicity using proton therapy. (Publication accessible )

Long-term outcome of a prospective study of dose-escalated proton therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This MD Anderson study published in the Green Journal reported proton therapy for early stage NSCLC patients who were not suitable for SBRT due to lesion size and location. The study reported encouraging 5-year overall survival rate and recurrence-free rate. The authors concluded that this long-term follow-up data demonstrated proton therapy with ablative doses is well tolerated and effective in medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC. (Publication accessible )


Long-term outcomes of proton therapy for previously untreated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Japanese group in University of Tsukuba conducted this retrospective study of 129 patients with stage 0 to C disease (BCLC) treated with proton therapy. The study reported favourable long-term efficacies with mild adverse effect in BCLC stage 0 to C patients. (Publication accessible )


Evidence-based medicine

Establishing evidence-based indications for proton therapy. An overview of current clinical trials of proton therapy published in the Red Journal. A total 122 ongoing trials with target enrolment of over 42,000 patients. The most common PBT clinical trials are about gastrointestinal tract tumors, tumors of the central nervous system and prostate cancer. There are 5 randomized studies between proton and photon are on lung, esophagus, head and neck, prostate and breast. The paper demonstrated that PBT clinical trials are rapidly expanding. (Publication accessible )

Patient estimates for proton therapy

Published in the Green Journal, this ESTRO-HERO (Health Economics in Radiation Oncology) analysis reported about 4 million new cancer patients are predicted in 2025 in Europe, a 15.9% increase compared to the number of 2012, and about 2 million cancer patients would have an indication for radiotherapy in 2025, a 16.1% increase from year 2012. New radiotherapy techniques enable delivery precision and less toxic effects combined with new chemotherapy could also influence the number of candidates for radiotherapy treatments. This paper is to raise awareness for resource planning and placing investments to adequately manage demands of cancer patients. (Publication accessible:

Key papers January - October 2016

Head and neck cancer

A retrospective study reported that proton therapy significantly reduced toxicity compared with IMRT for head and neck tumors. The toxicity outcome confirm the dosimetry advantages of proton which resulted in significantly lower rates of grade 2 or above acute dysgeusia, mucositis and nausea. (Publication accessible via )

A matched analysis compared PBRT and IMRT for nasopharynx and paranasal sinus cancers with concurrent chemotherapy, reported that PBRT was associated with a lower opioid pain requirement and a lower rate of gastrostomy tube dependence. (Publication accessible via )

Proton therapy can be a safe and effective curative reirradiation strategy for head and neck cancer, with acceptable rates of toxicity and durable disease control. A study reported encouraging 2-year rates of local regional control, overall survival and late toxicity. (Publication accessible via )

Hodgkin lymphoma

A registry study of collective proton centres reported a 2-year relapse-free survival of 85% with no grade 3 toxicity occurred. Hodgkin lymphoma young survivors are at great risk of developing chronic morbidities and secondary cancer, these patients may derive considerable benefit with proton therapy. (Article accessible via )

Gastrointestinal malignancy

A randomized trial comparing proton therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma, reported a trend toward improved local tumour control, progression-free survival, and significantly fewer hospitalization days after proton treatment. (Publication accessible via )


A systematic review examined clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton therapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms. The findings include that proton therapy was associated with reduced toxicity for esophageal cancer and pancreatic cancer while achieving similar disease control and survival compared to photon techniques. For hepatocellular carcinoma, proton therapy demonstrated a trend towards improved local control and progression-free survival. (Publication accessible via )


A systematic review reported findings on clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton therapy for breast cancer. Toxicity was comparable or improved to published photon data. Proton offers excellent potential to minimize the risk of cardiac events, keeping the mean heart dose at ≤1Gy. (Publication accessible via )



A large series of 1327 localized prostate cancer patients reported 5-year biochemical control rate, toxicity and patient-reported quality of life after proton therapy. The study concluded that image guided proton therapy provided excellent biochemical control rates and the actuarial rates of high-grade toxicity were low.  Publication accessible via )

Cost effectiveness

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of proton therapy found that proton therapy was a cost-effective option for several pediatric brain tumors, selected left-sided breast cancer, selected head and neck cancer and locoregionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. (Publication accessible via )

Clinical Decision

A clinical decision support system (PRODECIS) for choosing proton or photon modality for head and neck patients. Based on evaluation and comparison of dosimetry, toxicity, and cost-effectiveness, the system successfully quantified patients for proton or photon treatment choice. Publication accessible via )



Contact us

Subscribe to Clinical Highlights